<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Baroque Obama</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thisishistorictimes.com/2010/03/baroque-obama/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thisishistorictimes.com/2010/03/baroque-obama/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 04:15:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dreamslayer</title>
		<link>http://thisishistorictimes.com/2010/03/baroque-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-75027</link>
		<dc:creator>dreamslayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 03:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisishistorictimes.com/?p=1145#comment-75027</guid>
		<description>If actions speak louder then words, then why is the pen mightier then the sword?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If actions speak louder then words, then why is the pen mightier then the sword?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Poogboy</title>
		<link>http://thisishistorictimes.com/2010/03/baroque-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-53500</link>
		<dc:creator>Poogboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 04:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisishistorictimes.com/?p=1145#comment-53500</guid>
		<description>Oh man!
I&#039;m so glad I took music, I get this! xD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh man!<br />
I&#8217;m so glad I took music, I get this! xD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan</title>
		<link>http://thisishistorictimes.com/2010/03/baroque-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-14814</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 20:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisishistorictimes.com/?p=1145#comment-14814</guid>
		<description>Barack me Obamadeus!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barack me Obamadeus!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LagomorphMan</title>
		<link>http://thisishistorictimes.com/2010/03/baroque-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-9545</link>
		<dc:creator>LagomorphMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 07:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisishistorictimes.com/?p=1145#comment-9545</guid>
		<description>When I saw this, my first thought was &quot;Obama speaks well, and speaks clearly of what must be done, but his follow through is somewhat... lacking.&quot;

And I agree completely, sadly. But for all that, the saddest thing is everyday I find myself defending the man. I have a laundry list of complaints with Obama, but I almost find myself having a higher opinion of him merely because the people I find criticizing him do so for reasons that range from &quot;not well informed&quot; to &quot;batshit fucking crazy.&quot;

I know its wrong for me to have my opinions altered because of others uninformed opinions, but when you have people like Glenn Beck calling everyone and everything a Communist plot in a manner that would make Joey McCarthy blush, Tea Party protesters claiming his highly-centrist, pure-vanilla policies are 100% socialist plots to destroy America, and people who still think he&#039;s some kind of Kenyan Manchurian candidate, I find it difficult at times to essentially jump on-board his ship. If a man is measured by the quality of his enemies, what does it say when your enemies are like this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I saw this, my first thought was &#8220;Obama speaks well, and speaks clearly of what must be done, but his follow through is somewhat&#8230; lacking.&#8221;</p>
<p>And I agree completely, sadly. But for all that, the saddest thing is everyday I find myself defending the man. I have a laundry list of complaints with Obama, but I almost find myself having a higher opinion of him merely because the people I find criticizing him do so for reasons that range from &#8220;not well informed&#8221; to &#8220;batshit fucking crazy.&#8221;</p>
<p>I know its wrong for me to have my opinions altered because of others uninformed opinions, but when you have people like Glenn Beck calling everyone and everything a Communist plot in a manner that would make Joey McCarthy blush, Tea Party protesters claiming his highly-centrist, pure-vanilla policies are 100% socialist plots to destroy America, and people who still think he&#8217;s some kind of Kenyan Manchurian candidate, I find it difficult at times to essentially jump on-board his ship. If a man is measured by the quality of his enemies, what does it say when your enemies are like this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Perestroika</title>
		<link>http://thisishistorictimes.com/2010/03/baroque-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-9377</link>
		<dc:creator>Perestroika</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 13:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisishistorictimes.com/?p=1145#comment-9377</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know of you intended this, but on the first glance (that is, when I didn&#039;t yet understood the point about the musical notation of a break) I noticed a different meaning in this:
The positioning of the pen and papers suggested to me that Obama was just about to begin with &quot;Actions&quot; after finishing &quot;Words&quot;, but was interrupted. In this context, the bust in the back could mean that he &quot;died&quot; in the meantime, i.e. went out of office.

This is probably somewhat contrary to what you intended, but I find that it also brings the point across that not every issue can be fixed in a single legislative period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know of you intended this, but on the first glance (that is, when I didn&#8217;t yet understood the point about the musical notation of a break) I noticed a different meaning in this:<br />
The positioning of the pen and papers suggested to me that Obama was just about to begin with &#8220;Actions&#8221; after finishing &#8220;Words&#8221;, but was interrupted. In this context, the bust in the back could mean that he &#8220;died&#8221; in the meantime, i.e. went out of office.</p>
<p>This is probably somewhat contrary to what you intended, but I find that it also brings the point across that not every issue can be fixed in a single legislative period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Broggly</title>
		<link>http://thisishistorictimes.com/2010/03/baroque-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-9375</link>
		<dc:creator>Broggly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 12:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisishistorictimes.com/?p=1145#comment-9375</guid>
		<description>The music&#039;s also used as the theme music for Learn out Loud lectures. It&#039;s pretty good at implying erudition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The music&#8217;s also used as the theme music for Learn out Loud lectures. It&#8217;s pretty good at implying erudition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RJGNYC</title>
		<link>http://thisishistorictimes.com/2010/03/baroque-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-9345</link>
		<dc:creator>RJGNYC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisishistorictimes.com/?p=1145#comment-9345</guid>
		<description>&quot;The buck stops in the Oval Office.&quot;

But it has to get there first, and it hasn&#039;t. I blame the Senate for that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The buck stops in the Oval Office.&#8221;</p>
<p>But it has to get there first, and it hasn&#8217;t. I blame the Senate for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: W Gordon</title>
		<link>http://thisishistorictimes.com/2010/03/baroque-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-9342</link>
		<dc:creator>W Gordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisishistorictimes.com/?p=1145#comment-9342</guid>
		<description>Still, that doesn&#039;t mesh with what you&#039;re actually saying in the cartoon.

The sheet titled &quot;Words&quot; is elaborate and well-developed; contrasting is the sheet titled &quot;Actions&quot; filled without exception by rests. At the end, all it&#039;s doing is repeating the meme that &#039;Barack Obama hasn&#039;t done anything in his presidency.&#039; 

That&#039;s why I linked the &quot;Obameter&quot; above - it quickly and easily shows all the promises President Obama has made over his campaign and presidency and exactly how much progress he&#039;s made on each. They&#039;re all neatly sourced and elaborated on, so if you want to see exactly when and how he kept his promise to expand hate crime legislature to cover sexual orientation you can. 

If you&#039;re interested, http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/promise/290/push-for-enactment-of-matthew-shepard-act-which-e/

(And, for the record, they *have* changed their position on whether a promise was actually kept several times, so issues you have with the legitimacy of a kept promise might be worth contacting them about).

Really, I&#039;m just going over this because the Democratic meme of &quot;Obama hasn&#039;t done anything!!&quot; is almost nearing Republican levels of destructiveness and shows about the same level of research on the part of the speaker. He _has_ done quite a few things, even if he hasn&#039;t fixed everything he can possibly do. After all, he&#039;s been in office about four hundred days so far? He has a massive amount of presidency left in him and by all objective accounts he&#039;s certainly on his way to completing more promises.

So chill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still, that doesn&#8217;t mesh with what you&#8217;re actually saying in the cartoon.</p>
<p>The sheet titled &#8220;Words&#8221; is elaborate and well-developed; contrasting is the sheet titled &#8220;Actions&#8221; filled without exception by rests. At the end, all it&#8217;s doing is repeating the meme that &#8216;Barack Obama hasn&#8217;t done anything in his presidency.&#8217; </p>
<p>That&#8217;s why I linked the &#8220;Obameter&#8221; above &#8211; it quickly and easily shows all the promises President Obama has made over his campaign and presidency and exactly how much progress he&#8217;s made on each. They&#8217;re all neatly sourced and elaborated on, so if you want to see exactly when and how he kept his promise to expand hate crime legislature to cover sexual orientation you can. </p>
<p>If you&#8217;re interested, <a href="http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/promise/290/push-for-enactment-of-matthew-shepard-act-which-e/" rel="nofollow">http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/promise/290/push-for-enactment-of-matthew-shepard-act-which-e/</a></p>
<p>(And, for the record, they *have* changed their position on whether a promise was actually kept several times, so issues you have with the legitimacy of a kept promise might be worth contacting them about).</p>
<p>Really, I&#8217;m just going over this because the Democratic meme of &#8220;Obama hasn&#8217;t done anything!!&#8221; is almost nearing Republican levels of destructiveness and shows about the same level of research on the part of the speaker. He _has_ done quite a few things, even if he hasn&#8217;t fixed everything he can possibly do. After all, he&#8217;s been in office about four hundred days so far? He has a massive amount of presidency left in him and by all objective accounts he&#8217;s certainly on his way to completing more promises.</p>
<p>So chill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leo Petr</title>
		<link>http://thisishistorictimes.com/2010/03/baroque-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-9338</link>
		<dc:creator>Leo Petr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 13:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisishistorictimes.com/?p=1145#comment-9338</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know much about musical notation. To me, it looks like the second page has lots of progress bars (computer UI element) at a mere 10% completion. This gets the message across.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know much about musical notation. To me, it looks like the second page has lots of progress bars (computer UI element) at a mere 10% completion. This gets the message across.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deephurting</title>
		<link>http://thisishistorictimes.com/2010/03/baroque-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-9335</link>
		<dc:creator>deephurting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisishistorictimes.com/?p=1145#comment-9335</guid>
		<description>Congress didn&#039;t force Obama to drop support for (or oppose from the beginning) some of the avenues most likely to accomplish his claimed goal of finally providing healthcare to &lt;i&gt;all&lt;/i&gt; Americans, not just those with enough money.  Congress didn&#039;t force Obama to allow ethically questionable detention facilities like Bagram to continue operating or keep holding detainees indefinitely and without adequate judicial review.  Congress didn&#039;t force Obama to keep the extraordinary executive powers established by his predecessor or to openly support the NSA&#039;s warrantless surveillance program.

They didn&#039;t have to force him, because he&#039;s been &lt;i&gt;at least&lt;/i&gt; complicit with a lack of progress when it comes to these and other important issues.  I would rather Obama fight hard to accomplish the things he was elected to do and which he claims to support, &lt;i&gt;directly against&lt;/i&gt; Congress if necessary, and ultimately fail entirely than compromise those goals to the point of meaninglessness.

Congress should not be his scapegoat.  The buck stops in the Oval Office.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congress didn&#8217;t force Obama to drop support for (or oppose from the beginning) some of the avenues most likely to accomplish his claimed goal of finally providing healthcare to <i>all</i> Americans, not just those with enough money.  Congress didn&#8217;t force Obama to allow ethically questionable detention facilities like Bagram to continue operating or keep holding detainees indefinitely and without adequate judicial review.  Congress didn&#8217;t force Obama to keep the extraordinary executive powers established by his predecessor or to openly support the NSA&#8217;s warrantless surveillance program.</p>
<p>They didn&#8217;t have to force him, because he&#8217;s been <i>at least</i> complicit with a lack of progress when it comes to these and other important issues.  I would rather Obama fight hard to accomplish the things he was elected to do and which he claims to support, <i>directly against</i> Congress if necessary, and ultimately fail entirely than compromise those goals to the point of meaninglessness.</p>
<p>Congress should not be his scapegoat.  The buck stops in the Oval Office.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

