<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chain of Command</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thisishistorictimes.com/2009/10/chain-of-command/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thisishistorictimes.com/2009/10/chain-of-command/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 16:45:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: This is Historic Times &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Have a Chipper Christmas</title>
		<link>http://thisishistorictimes.com/2009/10/chain-of-command/comment-page-1/#comment-6780</link>
		<dc:creator>This is Historic Times &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Have a Chipper Christmas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 10:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisishistorictimes.com/?p=787#comment-6780</guid>
		<description>[...] when I drew Chain of Command, quite a few people correctly observed that the cartoon was more kind to the Democrats than it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] when I drew Chain of Command, quite a few people correctly observed that the cartoon was more kind to the Democrats than it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MntlWard</title>
		<link>http://thisishistorictimes.com/2009/10/chain-of-command/comment-page-1/#comment-5463</link>
		<dc:creator>MntlWard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 08:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisishistorictimes.com/?p=787#comment-5463</guid>
		<description>Actually, the Republicans did use the word &quot;bipartisanship&quot; quite a bit when Bush was in office, but they meant the same thing by it then as they do now:  the Democrats doing what the Republicans want.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the Republicans did use the word &#8220;bipartisanship&#8221; quite a bit when Bush was in office, but they meant the same thing by it then as they do now:  the Democrats doing what the Republicans want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://thisishistorictimes.com/2009/10/chain-of-command/comment-page-1/#comment-4932</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 01:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisishistorictimes.com/?p=787#comment-4932</guid>
		<description>Why is the elephant still so big and heavy in the &#039;2009&#039; part of the comic when the Democrats have a super-majority?  They don&#039;t NEED the elephant to come along with them.  They are just using the elephant as an excuse for inaction.  They want the elephant to buy into the plan so that the elephant can take part of the blame if the plan fails.   We already know the Republicans are corrupt, spineless, and inept.  It looks like the Democrats are as well.  For God&#039;s sake, vote independent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is the elephant still so big and heavy in the &#8216;2009&#8242; part of the comic when the Democrats have a super-majority?  They don&#8217;t NEED the elephant to come along with them.  They are just using the elephant as an excuse for inaction.  They want the elephant to buy into the plan so that the elephant can take part of the blame if the plan fails.   We already know the Republicans are corrupt, spineless, and inept.  It looks like the Democrats are as well.  For God&#8217;s sake, vote independent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Chain of Command&#8221; &#8211; [comic] &#171; Netcrema &#8211; creme de la social news via digg + delicious + stumpleupon + reddit</title>
		<link>http://thisishistorictimes.com/2009/10/chain-of-command/comment-page-1/#comment-4930</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Chain of Command&#8221; &#8211; [comic] &#171; Netcrema &#8211; creme de la social news via digg + delicious + stumpleupon + reddit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 22:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisishistorictimes.com/?p=787#comment-4930</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;Chain of Command&#8221; &#8211; [comic]thisishistorictimes.com [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;Chain of Command&#8221; &#8211; [comic]thisishistorictimes.com [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deephurting</title>
		<link>http://thisishistorictimes.com/2009/10/chain-of-command/comment-page-1/#comment-4928</link>
		<dc:creator>deephurting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 20:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisishistorictimes.com/?p=787#comment-4928</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;they are bending over backwards to try and make the Republicans happy despite the fact that it’s obvious that they have no interest in anything positive happening. They are hoping for failure.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

You might also enjoy &lt;a href=&quot;http://thisishistorictimes.com/2009/08/right-across/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this cartoon&lt;/a&gt;, if you haven&#039;t seen it already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;they are bending over backwards to try and make the Republicans happy despite the fact that it’s obvious that they have no interest in anything positive happening. They are hoping for failure.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>You might also enjoy <a href="http://thisishistorictimes.com/2009/08/right-across/" rel="nofollow">this cartoon</a>, if you haven&#8217;t seen it already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention This is Historic Times » Blog Archive » Chain of Command -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://thisishistorictimes.com/2009/10/chain-of-command/comment-page-1/#comment-4925</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention This is Historic Times » Blog Archive » Chain of Command -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 19:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisishistorictimes.com/?p=787#comment-4925</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Terrence Nowicki, Jr, bendur and Todays Politics. Todays Politics said: &quot;Chain of Command&quot; - [comic] #politics http://bit.ly/8Vtmc [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Terrence Nowicki, Jr, bendur and Todays Politics. Todays Politics said: &quot;Chain of Command&quot; &#8211; [comic] #politics <a href="http://bit.ly/8Vtmc" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/8Vtmc</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordy</title>
		<link>http://thisishistorictimes.com/2009/10/chain-of-command/comment-page-1/#comment-4921</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 17:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisishistorictimes.com/?p=787#comment-4921</guid>
		<description>*sigh*. Sad but true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*sigh*. Sad but true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marvin M</title>
		<link>http://thisishistorictimes.com/2009/10/chain-of-command/comment-page-1/#comment-4919</link>
		<dc:creator>Marvin M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 14:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisishistorictimes.com/?p=787#comment-4919</guid>
		<description>That about says it. It&#039;s funny how I freaking NEVER heard about &quot;bipartisianship&quot; when the Republicans were in power. I never once heard them give even the impression that they gave a crap about the Democratic minority.

Now that the Democrats are not only in power, but by a much larger % than the GOP was (and Obama won the election by nearly 10 million votes... while Bush actually lost the popular vote by 500,000!) they are bending over backwards to try and make the Republicans happy despite the fact that it&#039;s obvious that they have no interest in anything positive happening. They are hoping for failure.

It&#039;s amazing to me just how treasonous the Republican party really is. They are truly Anti-American.

After the way they celebrated the US losing the olympics yesterday, I&#039;m starting to wonder what they wouldn&#039;t celebrate? If the stock market went down 2000 points they&#039;d be out in setting off fireworks.

And I hate to say it, because it&#039;s so disgusting, but I honestly think that most right wingers would celebrate if we were attacked by terrorists again, just so they could blame it on Obama.

That&#039;s how sick and twisted these people are. We have to leave them behind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That about says it. It&#8217;s funny how I freaking NEVER heard about &#8220;bipartisianship&#8221; when the Republicans were in power. I never once heard them give even the impression that they gave a crap about the Democratic minority.</p>
<p>Now that the Democrats are not only in power, but by a much larger % than the GOP was (and Obama won the election by nearly 10 million votes&#8230; while Bush actually lost the popular vote by 500,000!) they are bending over backwards to try and make the Republicans happy despite the fact that it&#8217;s obvious that they have no interest in anything positive happening. They are hoping for failure.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s amazing to me just how treasonous the Republican party really is. They are truly Anti-American.</p>
<p>After the way they celebrated the US losing the olympics yesterday, I&#8217;m starting to wonder what they wouldn&#8217;t celebrate? If the stock market went down 2000 points they&#8217;d be out in setting off fireworks.</p>
<p>And I hate to say it, because it&#8217;s so disgusting, but I honestly think that most right wingers would celebrate if we were attacked by terrorists again, just so they could blame it on Obama.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s how sick and twisted these people are. We have to leave them behind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
